| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPfLBif-=09B9jZ3qN1kWdTAcrBQZGvZ+A-MUifXK4si9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:57:19 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, vireshk@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kgene@...nel.org, pankaj.dubey@...sung.com,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartłomiej Żołnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] soc: samsung: Add exynos chipid driver support
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 16:31, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
>
> Exynos SoCs have Chipid, for identification of product IDs and SoC
> revisions. This patch intends to provide initialization code for all
> these functionalities, at the same time it provides some sysfs entries
> for accessing these information to user-space.
>
> This driver uses existing binding for exynos-chipid.
>
> Changes by Bartlomiej:
> - fixed return values on errors
> - removed bogus kfree_const()
> - added missing Exynos4210 EVT0 id
> - converted code to use EXYNOS_MASK define
> - fixed np use after of_node_put()
> - fixed too early use of dev_info()
> - made driver fail for unknown SoC-s
> - added SPDX tag
> - updated Copyrights
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
> [m.szyprowski: for suggestion and code snippet of product_id_to_soc_id]
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> [s.nawrocki: updated copyright date]
> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 5 ++
> drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> index 2186285fda92..2905f5262197 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ menuconfig SOC_SAMSUNG
>
> if SOC_SAMSUNG
>
> +config EXYNOS_CHIPID
> + bool "Exynos Chipid controller driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST
> + select SOC_BUS
> +
> config EXYNOS_PMU
> bool "Exynos PMU controller driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || ((ARM || ARM64) && COMPILE_TEST)
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> index 29f294baac6e..3b6a8797416c 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_CHIPID) += exynos-chipid.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU) += exynos-pmu.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU_ARM_DRIVERS) += exynos3250-pmu.o exynos4-pmu.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..78b123ee60c0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-chipid.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2019 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + * http://www.samsung.com/
> + *
> + * EXYNOS - CHIP ID support
> + * Author: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
> + * Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
Any changes here from my previous comments?
I have also one more new thought later.
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +
> +#define EXYNOS_SUBREV_MASK (0xF << 4)
> +#define EXYNOS_MAINREV_MASK (0xF << 0)
> +#define EXYNOS_REV_MASK (EXYNOS_SUBREV_MASK | EXYNOS_MAINREV_MASK)
> +#define EXYNOS_MASK 0xFFFFF000
> +
> +static const struct exynos_soc_id {
> + const char *name;
> + unsigned int id;
> +} soc_ids[] = {
> + { "EXYNOS3250", 0xE3472000 },
> + { "EXYNOS4210", 0x43200000 }, /* EVT0 revision */
> + { "EXYNOS4210", 0x43210000 },
> + { "EXYNOS4212", 0x43220000 },
> + { "EXYNOS4412", 0xE4412000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5250", 0x43520000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5260", 0xE5260000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5410", 0xE5410000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5420", 0xE5420000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5440", 0xE5440000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5800", 0xE5422000 },
> + { "EXYNOS7420", 0xE7420000 },
> + { "EXYNOS5433", 0xE5433000 },
> +};
> +
> +static const char * __init product_id_to_soc_id(unsigned int product_id)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(soc_ids); i++)
> + if ((product_id & EXYNOS_MASK) == soc_ids[i].id)
> + return soc_ids[i].name;
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +int __init exynos_chipid_early_init(void)
> +{
> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> + void __iomem *exynos_chipid_base;
> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> + struct device_node *root;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + u32 product_id;
> + u32 revision;
> +
> + /* look up for chipid node */
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "samsung,exynos4210-chipid");
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + exynos_chipid_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + of_node_put(np);
> +
> + if (!exynos_chipid_base) {
> + pr_err("Failed to map SoC chipid\n");
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + product_id = readl_relaxed(exynos_chipid_base);
> + revision = product_id & EXYNOS_REV_MASK;
> + iounmap(exynos_chipid_base);
> +
> + soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!soc_dev_attr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + soc_dev_attr->family = "Samsung Exynos";
> +
> + root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> + of_property_read_string(root, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine);
> + of_node_put(root);
> +
> + soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%x", revision);
> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = product_id_to_soc_id(product_id);
> + if (!soc_dev_attr->soc_id) {
> + pr_err("Unknown SoC\n");
In case of running old kernel on unknown SoC (new revision of existing
one or older design not longer supported like 4415), the device will
not bind. This was added by Bartlomiej. Why? I imagine that soc driver
could be still matched and just report "Unknown". I am not sure if
this changes anything, though.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + /* please note that the actual registration will be deferred */
> + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
> + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr);
> + return PTR_ERR(soc_dev);
> + }
> +
> + /* it is too early to use dev_info() here (soc_dev is NULL) */
> + pr_info("soc soc0: Exynos: CPU[%s] PRO_ID[0x%x] REV[0x%x] Detected\n",
> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id, product_id, revision);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +early_initcall(exynos_chipid_early_init);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists