Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:25:11 +0200
From:   Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.3-rc1

On 7/23/19 7:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-07-22 at 19:42 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 7/22/19 4:45 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> [linux-scsi added to cc]
>>> On Mon, 2019-07-22 at 15:21 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 02:33:38PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [ ... ]
>>>>>
>>>>> Go test,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Things looked pretty good until a few days ago. Unfortunately,
>>>> the last few days brought in a couple of issues.
>>>>
>>>> riscv:virt:defconfig:scsi[virtio]
>>>> riscv:virt:defconfig:scsi[virtio-pci]
>>>>
>>>> Boot tests crash with no useful backtrace. Bisect points to
>>>> merge ac60602a6d8f ("Merge tag 'dma-mapping-5.3-1'"). Log is at
>>>> https://kerneltests.org/builders/qemu-riscv64-master/builds/238/s
>>>> teps
>>>> /qemubuildcommand_1/logs/stdio
>>>>
>>>> ppc:mpc8544ds:mpc85xx_defconfig:sata-sii3112
>>>> ppc64:pseries:pseries_defconfig:sata-sii3112
>>>> ppc64:pseries:pseries_defconfig:little:sata-sii3112
>>>> ppc64:ppce500:corenet64_smp_defconfig:e5500:sata-sii3112
>>>>
>>>> ata1: lost interrupt (Status 0x50)
>>>> ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
>>>> ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
>>>>
>>>> and many similar errors. Boot ultimately times out. Bisect points
>>>> to
>>>> merge
>>>> f65420df914a ("Merge tag 'scsi-fixes'").
>>>>
>>>> Logs:
>>>> https://kerneltests.org/builders/qemu-ppc64-master/builds/1212/st
>>>> eps/
>>>> qemubuildcommand/logs/stdio
>>>> https://kerneltests.org/builders/qemu-ppc-master/builds/1255/step
>>>> s/qe
>>>> mubuildcommand/logs/stdio
>>>>
>>>> Guenter
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> riscv bisect log
>>>>
>>>> # bad: [5f9e832c137075045d15cd6899ab0505cfb2ca4b] Linus 5.3-rc1
>>>> # good: [bdd17bdef7d8da4d8eee254abb4c92d8a566bdc1] scsi: core:
>>>> take
>>>> the DMA max mapping size into account

>>>> # first bad commit: [ac60602a6d8f6830dee89f4b87ee005f62eb7171]
>>>> Merge
>>>> tag 'dma-mapping-5.3-1' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-
>>>> mapping

>>> When a bisect lands on a merge commit it usually indicates bad
>>> interaction between two trees.  The way to find it is to do a
>>> bisect,
>>> but merge up to the other side of the scsi-fixes pull before
>>> running
>>> tests so the interaction is exposed in the bisect.
>>>
>>
>> Can you provide instructions for dummies ?
> 
> do a man git-bisect and then follow the 'Automatically bisect with
> temporary modifications' example.  You substitute
> 168c79971b4a7be7011e73bf488b740a8e1135c8 for hot-fix
> 
>>> However my money is on:
>>>
>>>
>>> commit bdd17bdef7d8da4d8eee254abb4c92d8a566bdc1
>>> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>>> Date:   Mon Jun 17 14:19:54 2019 +0200
>>>
>>>       scsi: core: take the DMA max mapping size into account
>>>    
>>> Now that I look at the code again:
>>>
>>>
>>> +       shost->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, shost-
>>>> max_sectors,
>>> +                       dma_max_mapping_size(dev) << SECTOR_SHIFT);
>>>
>>> That shift looks to be the wrong way around (should be >>).  I bet
>>> something is giving a very large number which becomes zero on left
>>> shift, meaning max_sectors gets set to zero.
>>>
>>
>> That does indeed look bad, but changing it doesn't make a difference.
> 
> Odd, all the other changes are driver specific (and not in ATA) apart
> from this one:
> 
> commit 7ad388d8e4c703980b7018b938cdeec58832d78d
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Date:   Mon Jun 17 14:19:53 2019 +0200
> 
>      scsi: core: add a host / host template field for the virt boundary
> 
> 
> I suppose it could be because the virt_boundary_mask isn't set, but
> that should just set zero, which is what block usually does.

I found max_segment_size unexpectedly to be UINT_MAX with zfcp today in our CI. 
My investigations are still very early, but I thought, I share a few thoughts 
as I'm way too unfamiliar with the DMA business and thus hope for help.

Above commit introduced an unconditional call to blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, 
shost->virt_boundary_mask), _after_ blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, 
shost->max_segment_size).

Looking at the source, dma_set_max_seg_size() seems to unconditionally 
overwrite max_segment_size:

> /**
>  * blk_queue_virt_boundary - set boundary rules for bio merging
>  * @q:  the request queue for the device
>  * @mask:  the memory boundary mask
>  **/
> void blk_queue_virt_boundary(struct request_queue *q, unsigned long mask)
> {
> 	q->limits.virt_boundary_mask = mask;
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Devices that require a virtual boundary do not support scatter/gather
> 	 * I/O natively, but instead require a descriptor list entry for each
> 	 * page (which might not be idential to the Linux PAGE_SIZE).  Because
> 	 * of that they are not limited by our notion of "segment size".
> 	 */
> 	q->limits.max_segment_size = UINT_MAX;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_virt_boundary);

Wild guess: Do we need to make the call to blk_queue_virt_boundary() conditional?

Cf. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg131077.html ("[PATCH v2] iser: 
explicitly set shost max_segment_size if non virtual boundary devices")

-- 
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards
Steffen Maier

Linux on IBM Z Development

https://www.ibm.com/privacy/us/en/
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

Powered by blists - more mailing lists