[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d371e9d.1c69fb81.8d9f4.1ac0@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:50:05 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add unit name to soc node
Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-07-22 05:34:18)
> We get a warning about missing unit name for soc node, so add it.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi:623.11-2814.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> index 601cfb078bd5..e81f4a6d08ce 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@
> method = "smc";
> };
>
> - soc: soc {
> + soc: soc@0 {
This is kinda sad, but ok. Maybe you can apply this fix to at least all
the qcom boards then.
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <2>;
> ranges = <0 0 0 0 0x10 0>;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists