linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] backlight: gpio: use a helper variable for &pdev->dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190723153426.GL9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 18:34:26 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] backlight: gpio: use a helper variable for
 &pdev->dev

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:29:52AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> pon., 22 lip 2019 o 18:09 Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> napisał(a):
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 05:03:02PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > >
> > > Instead of dereferencing pdev each time, use a helper variable for
> > > the associated device pointer.
> >
> > >  static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  {
> > > -     struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata =
> > > -             dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > > +     struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata;
> > >       struct backlight_properties props;
> > >       struct backlight_device *bl;
> > >       struct gpio_backlight *gbl;
> > >       enum gpiod_flags flags;
> > > +     struct device *dev;
> >
> > Can't we do
> >
> >         struct device dev = &pdev->dev;
> >         struct gpio_backlight_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> >
> > ? It fits 80 nicely.
> >
> 
> IMO it's more readable like that with the reverse christmas tree layout.

It makes more churn in the original code and for initializers the order is
defined by its nature.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko