[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190723153851.GE720@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:38:51 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, eric.auger.pro@...il.com,
hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size
call
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:36:09PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> index c8be1c4f5b55..37c143971211 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ size_t virtio_max_dma_size(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>> {
>> size_t max_segment_size = SIZE_MAX;
>> - if (vring_use_dma_api(vdev))
>> + if (vring_use_dma_api(vdev) && vdev->dev.dma_mask)
>
> Hmm, might it make sense to roll that check up into vring_use_dma_api()
> itself? After all, if the device has no mask then it's likely that other
> DMA API ops wouldn't really work as expected either.
Makes sense to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists