[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190723110206.4cb1f6b1@hermes.lan>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:02:06 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] netlink: add validation of NLA_F_NESTED
flag
On Thu, 2 May 2019 16:15:10 +0200 (CEST)
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz> wrote:
> Add new validation flag NL_VALIDATE_NESTED which adds three consistency
> checks of NLA_F_NESTED_FLAG:
>
> - the flag is set on attributes with NLA_NESTED{,_ARRAY} policy
> - the flag is not set on attributes with other policies except NLA_UNSPEC
> - the flag is set on attribute passed to nla_parse_nested()
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
>
> v2: change error messages to mention NLA_F_NESTED explicitly
There are some cases where netlink related to IPv4 does not send nested
flag. You risk breaking older iproute2 and other tools being used on newer
kernel. I.e this patch may break binary compatibility. Have you tried running
with this on a very old distro (like Redhat Linux 9)?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists