[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190724184512.162887-4-nums@google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:45:12 -0700
From: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@...gle.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com, mbd@...com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
eranian@...gle.com, Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Fix insn.c misaligned address error
The ubsan (undefined behavior sanitizer) version of perf throws an
error on the 'x86 instruction decoder - new instructions' function
of perf test.
To reproduce this run:
make -C tools/perf USE_CLANG=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=undefined"
then run: tools/perf/perf test 62 -v
The error occurs in the __get_next macro (line 34) where an int is
read from a potentially unaligned address. Using memcpy instead of
assignment from an unaligned pointer.
Signed-off-by: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@...gle.com>
---
tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/insn.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/insn.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/insn.c
index ca983e2bea8b..de1944c60aa9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/insn.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/insn.c
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@
((insn)->next_byte + sizeof(t) + n <= (insn)->end_kaddr)
#define __get_next(t, insn) \
- ({ t r = *(t*)insn->next_byte; insn->next_byte += sizeof(t); r; })
+ ({ t r; memcpy(&r, insn->next_byte, sizeof(t)); \
+ insn->next_byte += sizeof(t); r; })
#define __peek_nbyte_next(t, insn, n) \
({ t r = *(t*)((insn)->next_byte + n); r; })
--
2.22.0.657.g960e92d24f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists