linux-kernel - Re: [v4 3/3] coccinelle: Add script to check for platform_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ba98738-00a0-4bee-55ab-36127197fb85@web.de>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 20:45:55 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [v4 3/3] coccinelle: Add script to check for platform_get_irq()
 excessive prints

>> Will further software development considerations become more interesting
>> also around a contribution like “Coccinelle: Add a SmPL script for
>> the reconsideration of redundant dev_err() calls”?
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2744a3fc-9e67-8113-1dd9-43669e06386a@web.de/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1095937/
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/1/145
>> https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-July/006071.html
>>
>
> Did this patch ever get merged?

Not yet. - I hope that this addition is still in the usual patch review queue.


> It seems better to amend that patch instead of introduce another one.

Further extensions can become more challenging for this software area.
How would you like to adjust common implementation details?

Regards,
Markus