linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190724130252.7c29bba9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:02:52 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/sun4i-lradc-keys.txt

between commit:

  355fb0e54e85 ("dt-bindings: input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add A64 compatible")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  3f587b3b77b9 ("dt-bindings: input: Convert Allwinner LRADC to a schema")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (I removed the file - the additions from the former
have been incorporated into the latter) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped