| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190724191800.013685659@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:20:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 338/413] arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
commit bd82d4bd21880b7c4d5f5756be435095d6ae07b5 upstream.
When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal
with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a
PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore()
potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the
state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1].
In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce
a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent
whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it
takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR.
GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> |
GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as
some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path)
requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the
CPU when using only PSR.I.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html
Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.1.x-
Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 4 +-
arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h | 67 ++++++++++++++---------------------
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 ++-
arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 10 ++++-
arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 38 +++++++++++++++++---
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 2 -
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 8 ++--
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 2 -
9 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
@@ -152,7 +152,9 @@ static inline bool gic_prio_masking_enab
static inline void gic_pmr_mask_irqs(void)
{
- BUILD_BUG_ON(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI <= GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI < (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF |
+ GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI >= GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF);
}
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
+#include <asm/arch_gicv3.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#define DAIF_PROCCTX 0
@@ -21,6 +22,11 @@ static inline void local_daif_mask(void)
:
:
: "memory");
+
+ /* Don't really care for a dsb here, we don't intend to enable IRQs */
+ if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
+
trace_hardirqs_off();
}
@@ -32,7 +38,7 @@ static inline unsigned long local_daif_s
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
/* If IRQs are masked with PMR, reflect it in the flags */
- if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) <= GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF)
+ if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) != GIC_PRIO_IRQON)
flags |= PSR_I_BIT;
}
@@ -48,36 +54,44 @@ static inline void local_daif_restore(un
if (!irq_disabled) {
trace_hardirqs_on();
- if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
- arch_local_irq_enable();
- } else if (!(flags & PSR_A_BIT)) {
- /*
- * If interrupts are disabled but we can take
- * asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs
- */
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
- flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
+ dsb(sy);
+ }
+ } else if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
+ u64 pmr;
+
+ if (!(flags & PSR_A_BIT)) {
/*
- * There has been concern that the write to daif
- * might be reordered before this write to PMR.
- * From the ARM ARM DDI 0487D.a, section D1.7.1
- * "Accessing PSTATE fields":
- * Writes to the PSTATE fields have side-effects on
- * various aspects of the PE operation. All of these
- * side-effects are guaranteed:
- * - Not to be visible to earlier instructions in
- * the execution stream.
- * - To be visible to later instructions in the
- * execution stream
- *
- * Also, writes to PMR are self-synchronizing, so no
- * interrupts with a lower priority than PMR is signaled
- * to the PE after the write.
- *
- * So we don't need additional synchronization here.
+ * If interrupts are disabled but we can take
+ * asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs
*/
- arch_local_irq_disable();
+ flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
+ pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF;
+ } else {
+ pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET;
}
+
+ /*
+ * There has been concern that the write to daif
+ * might be reordered before this write to PMR.
+ * From the ARM ARM DDI 0487D.a, section D1.7.1
+ * "Accessing PSTATE fields":
+ * Writes to the PSTATE fields have side-effects on
+ * various aspects of the PE operation. All of these
+ * side-effects are guaranteed:
+ * - Not to be visible to earlier instructions in
+ * the execution stream.
+ * - To be visible to later instructions in the
+ * execution stream
+ *
+ * Also, writes to PMR are self-synchronizing, so no
+ * interrupts with a lower priority than PMR is signaled
+ * to the PE after the write.
+ *
+ * So we don't need additional synchronization here.
+ */
+ gic_write_pmr(pmr);
}
write_sysreg(flags, daif);
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
@@ -56,43 +56,46 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disabl
*/
static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
{
- unsigned long daif_bits;
unsigned long flags;
- daif_bits = read_sysreg(daif);
-
- /*
- * The asm is logically equivalent to:
- *
- * if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
- * flags = (daif_bits & PSR_I_BIT) ?
- * GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF :
- * read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1);
- * else
- * flags = daif_bits;
- */
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
- "mov %0, %1\n"
- "nop\n"
- "nop",
- __mrs_s("%0", SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1)
- "ands %1, %1, " __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n"
- "csel %0, %0, %2, eq",
- ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
- : "=&r" (flags), "+r" (daif_bits)
- : "r" ((unsigned long) GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF)
- : "cc", "memory");
+ "mrs %0, daif",
+ __mrs_s("%0", SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1),
+ ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
+ : "=&r" (flags)
+ :
+ : "memory");
return flags;
}
+static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
+{
+ int res;
+
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
+ "and %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(PSR_I_BIT),
+ "eor %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(GIC_PRIO_IRQON),
+ ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
+ : "=&r" (res)
+ : "r" ((int) flags)
+ : "memory");
+
+ return res;
+}
+
static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
flags = arch_local_save_flags();
- arch_local_irq_disable();
+ /*
+ * There are too many states with IRQs disabled, just keep the current
+ * state if interrupts are already disabled/masked.
+ */
+ if (!arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
+ arch_local_irq_disable();
return flags;
}
@@ -113,21 +116,5 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_restor
: "memory");
}
-static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
-{
- int res;
-
- asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
- "and %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n"
- "nop",
- "cmp %w1, #" __stringify(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF) "\n"
- "cset %w0, ls",
- ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
- : "=&r" (res)
- : "r" ((int) flags)
- : "cc", "memory");
-
- return res;
-}
#endif
#endif
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -597,11 +597,12 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_ent
* will not signal the CPU of interrupts of lower priority, and the
* only way to get out will be via guest exceptions.
* Naturally, we want to avoid this.
+ *
+ * local_daif_mask() already sets GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET, we just need a
+ * dsb to ensure the redistributor is forwards EL2 IRQs to the CPU.
*/
- if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
- gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
+ if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
dsb(sy);
- }
}
static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit(void)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -24,9 +24,15 @@
* means masking more IRQs (or at least that the same IRQs remain masked).
*
* To mask interrupts, we clear the most significant bit of PMR.
+ *
+ * Some code sections either automatically switch back to PSR.I or explicitly
+ * require to not use priority masking. If bit GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is included
+ * in the the priority mask, it indicates that PSR.I should be set and
+ * interrupt disabling temporarily does not rely on IRQ priorities.
*/
-#define GIC_PRIO_IRQON 0xf0
-#define GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF (GIC_PRIO_IRQON & ~0x80)
+#define GIC_PRIO_IRQON 0xc0
+#define GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF (GIC_PRIO_IRQON & ~0x80)
+#define GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET (1 << 4)
/* Additional SPSR bits not exposed in the UABI */
#define PSR_IL_BIT (1 << 20)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
/*
* Registers that may be useful after this macro is invoked:
*
+ * x20 - ICC_PMR_EL1
* x21 - aborted SP
* x22 - aborted PC
* x23 - aborted PSTATE
@@ -438,6 +439,24 @@ alternative_endif
.endm
#endif
+ .macro gic_prio_kentry_setup, tmp:req
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
+ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
+ mov \tmp, #(GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET | GIC_PRIO_IRQON)
+ msr_s SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, \tmp
+ alternative_else_nop_endif
+#endif
+ .endm
+
+ .macro gic_prio_irq_setup, pmr:req, tmp:req
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
+ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
+ orr \tmp, \pmr, #GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET
+ msr_s SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, \tmp
+ alternative_else_nop_endif
+#endif
+ .endm
+
.text
/*
@@ -616,6 +635,7 @@ el1_dbg:
cmp x24, #ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64 // if BRK64
cinc x24, x24, eq // set bit '0'
tbz x24, #0, el1_inv // EL1 only
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3
mrs x0, far_el1
mov x2, sp // struct pt_regs
bl do_debug_exception
@@ -633,12 +653,10 @@ ENDPROC(el1_sync)
.align 6
el1_irq:
kernel_entry 1
+ gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x1
enable_da_f
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
-alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
- ldr x20, [sp, #S_PMR_SAVE]
-alternative_else_nop_endif
test_irqs_unmasked res=x0, pmr=x20
cbz x0, 1f
bl asm_nmi_enter
@@ -668,8 +686,9 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
/*
- * if IRQs were disabled when we received the interrupt, we have an NMI
- * and we are not re-enabling interrupt upon eret. Skip tracing.
+ * When using IRQ priority masking, we can get spurious interrupts while
+ * PMR is set to GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF. An NMI might also have occurred in a
+ * section with interrupts disabled. Skip tracing in those cases.
*/
test_irqs_unmasked res=x0, pmr=x20
cbz x0, 1f
@@ -798,6 +817,7 @@ el0_ia:
* Instruction abort handling
*/
mrs x26, far_el1
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x0
enable_da_f
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
bl trace_hardirqs_off
@@ -843,6 +863,7 @@ el0_sp_pc:
* Stack or PC alignment exception handling
*/
mrs x26, far_el1
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x0
enable_da_f
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
bl trace_hardirqs_off
@@ -877,6 +898,7 @@ el0_dbg:
* Debug exception handling
*/
tbnz x24, #0, el0_inv // EL0 only
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3
mrs x0, far_el1
mov x1, x25
mov x2, sp
@@ -898,7 +920,9 @@ ENDPROC(el0_sync)
el0_irq:
kernel_entry 0
el0_irq_naked:
+ gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x0
enable_da_f
+
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
bl trace_hardirqs_off
#endif
@@ -920,6 +944,7 @@ ENDPROC(el0_irq)
el1_error:
kernel_entry 1
mrs x1, esr_el1
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x2
enable_dbg
mov x0, sp
bl do_serror
@@ -930,6 +955,7 @@ el0_error:
kernel_entry 0
el0_error_naked:
mrs x1, esr_el1
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x2
enable_dbg
mov x0, sp
bl do_serror
@@ -954,6 +980,7 @@ work_pending:
*/
ret_to_user:
disable_daif
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3
ldr x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]
and x2, x1, #_TIF_WORK_MASK
cbnz x2, work_pending
@@ -970,6 +997,7 @@ ENDPROC(ret_to_user)
*/
.align 6
el0_svc:
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x1
mov x0, sp
bl el0_svc_handler
b ret_to_user
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void __cpu_do_idle_irqprio(void)
* be raised.
*/
pmr = gic_read_pmr();
- gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
__cpu_do_idle();
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -181,11 +181,13 @@ static void init_gic_priority_masking(vo
WARN_ON(!(cpuflags & PSR_I_BIT));
- gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF);
-
/* We can only unmask PSR.I if we can take aborts */
- if (!(cpuflags & PSR_A_BIT))
+ if (!(cpuflags & PSR_A_BIT)) {
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF);
write_sysreg(cpuflags & ~PSR_I_BIT, daif);
+ } else {
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
+ }
}
/*
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe(struc
* Naturally, we want to avoid this.
*/
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
- gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
dsb(sy);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists