[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx89X0Xra+3HK+jbuCHXMgRL7QCwSShyMy7DY2Bg1eVjDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:26:30 -0700
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] PM / devfreq: Add required OPPs support to passive governor
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 3:04 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 17-07-19, 15:23, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Look at the required OPPs of the "parent" device to determine the OPP that
> > is required from the slave device managed by the passive governor. This
> > allows having mappings between a parent device and a slave device even when
> > they don't have the same number of OPPs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
> > Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> > index 58308948b863..24ce94c80f06 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c
> > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static int devfreq_passive_get_target_freq(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> > = (struct devfreq_passive_data *)devfreq->data;
> > struct devfreq *parent_devfreq = (struct devfreq *)p_data->parent;
> > unsigned long child_freq = ULONG_MAX;
> > - struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> > + struct dev_pm_opp *opp = NULL, *p_opp = NULL;
>
> This won't be required if ...
>
> > int i, count, ret = 0;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -56,13 +56,20 @@ static int devfreq_passive_get_target_freq(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> > * list of parent device. Because in this case, *freq is temporary
> > * value which is decided by ondemand governor.
> > */
> > - opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(parent_devfreq->dev.parent, freq, 0);
> > - if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(opp);
> > + p_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(parent_devfreq->dev.parent, freq, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(p_opp)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(p_opp);
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
> > + if (devfreq->opp_table && parent_devfreq->opp_table)
> > + opp = dev_pm_opp_xlate_opp(parent_devfreq->opp_table,
> > + devfreq->opp_table, p_opp);
>
> you put p_opp right here.
>
> Also shouldn't you try to get p_opp under the above if block only? As
> that is the only user of it ?
No, p_opp (used to be called opp) was used even before my changes. If
there's no required-opps mapping this falls back to assuming the slave
device OPP to pick should be the same index as the master device's
opp.
So I believe this patch is correct as-is.
-Saravana
>
> > + if (opp) {
> > + *freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp);
> > + dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > * Get the OPP table's index of decided freqeuncy by governor
> > @@ -89,6 +96,9 @@ static int devfreq_passive_get_target_freq(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> > *freq = child_freq;
> >
> > out:
> > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(opp))
> > + dev_pm_opp_put(p_opp);
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.22.0.510.g264f2c817a-goog
>
> --
> viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists