[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190724191746.906791848@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:17:37 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware)" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 166/413] block, bfq: fix rq_in_driver check in bfq_update_inject_limit
[ Upstream commit db599f9ed9bd31b018b6c48ad7c6b21d5b790ecf ]
One of the cases where the parameters for injection may be updated is
when there are no more in-flight I/O requests. The number of in-flight
requests is stored in the field bfqd->rq_in_driver of the descriptor
bfqd of the device. So, the controlled condition is
bfqd->rq_in_driver == 0.
Unfortunately, this is wrong because, the instruction that checks this
condition is in the code path that handles the completion of a
request, and, in particular, the instruction is executed before
bfqd->rq_in_driver is decremented in such a code path.
This commit fixes this issue by just replacing 0 with 1 in the
comparison.
Reported-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Tested-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index e5db3856b194..404e776aa36d 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -5398,8 +5398,14 @@ static void bfq_update_inject_limit(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
* total service time, and there seem to be the right
* conditions to do it, or we can lower the last base value
* computed.
+ *
+ * NOTE: (bfqd->rq_in_driver == 1) means that there is no I/O
+ * request in flight, because this function is in the code
+ * path that handles the completion of a request of bfqq, and,
+ * in particular, this function is executed before
+ * bfqd->rq_in_driver is decremented in such a code path.
*/
- if ((bfqq->last_serv_time_ns == 0 && bfqd->rq_in_driver == 0) ||
+ if ((bfqq->last_serv_time_ns == 0 && bfqd->rq_in_driver == 1) ||
tot_time_ns < bfqq->last_serv_time_ns) {
bfqq->last_serv_time_ns = tot_time_ns;
/*
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists