[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190724055412.GB4412@osiris>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:54:12 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Farhan Ali <alifm@...ux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the s390-fixes tree
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 07:42:27AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> In commit
> 8b515be512a2 ("vfio-ccw: Fix memory leak and don't call cp_free in cp_init")
> Fixes tag
> Fixes: 812271b910 ("s390/cio: Squash cp_free() and cp_unpin_free()")
> - SHA1 should be at least 12 digits long
> Can be fixed by setting core.abbrev to 12 (or more) or (for git v2.11
> or later) just making sure it is not set (or set to "auto").
Yes, I noticed this when merging the vfio tree, but decided to not
ask for a rebase to fix this.
Are your scripts that do sanity checks available somewhere? I'm
wondering since I would also like to do some sanity checks before
pushing updates to kernel.org like
- has the git author signed off the patch?
- has the git committer signed off the patch?
- are "fixes" tags sane: does commit exist and is format ok?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists