linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] ceph: fix directories inode i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874l3b694l.fsf@suse.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:04:58 +0100
From:   Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>
To:     "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@...il.com>, "Sage Weil" <sage@...hat.com>,
        <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ceph: fix directories inode i_blkbits initialization

Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com> writes:

> "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org> writes:
>
>> On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 16:50 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
>>> When filling an inode with info from the MDS, i_blkbits is being
>>> initialized using fl_stripe_unit, which contains the stripe unit in
>>> bytes.  Unfortunately, this doesn't make sense for directories as they
>>> have fl_stripe_unit set to '0'.  This means that i_blkbits will be set
>>> to 0xff, causing an UBSAN undefined behaviour in i_blocksize():
>>> 
>>>   UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/fs.h:731:12
>>>   shift exponent 255 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
>>> 
>>> Fix this by initializing i_blkbits to CEPH_BLOCK_SHIFT if fl_stripe_unit
>>> is zero.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/ceph/inode.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>> 
>>> To be honest, I'm not sure CEPH_BLOCK_SHIFT is the right value to use
>>> here, but for sure the one currently being used isn't correct if the
>>> inode is a directory.  Using stripe units seems to be a bug that has
>>> been there since the beginning, but it definitely became bigger problem
>>> after commit 69448867abcb ("fs: shave 8 bytes off of struct inode").
>>> 
>>> This fix could also be moved into the 'switch' statement later in that
>>> function, in the S_IFDIR case, similar to commit 5ba72e607cdb ("ceph:
>>> set special inode's blocksize to page size").  Let me know which version
>>> you would prefer.
>>> 
>>
>> What happens with (e.g.) named pipes or symlinks? Do those inodes also
>> get this bogus value? Assuming that they do, I'd probably prefer this
>> patch since it'd fix things for all inode types, not just directories.
>
> I tested symlinks and they seem to be handled correctly (i.e. the stripe
> units seems to be the same as the target file).  Regarding pipes, I
> didn't test them, but from the code it should be set to PAGE_SHIFT (see
> the above mentioned commit 5ba72e607cdb).

Ok, after looking closer at the other inode types and running a few
tests with extra debug code, it all seems to be sane -- only directories
(root dir is an exception) will cause problems with i_blkbits being set
to a bogus value.  So, I'm sticking with my original RFC patch approach,
which should be easy to apply to stable kernels.

Cheers,
-- 
Luis

>
> Anyway, I can change the code to do *all* the i_blkbits initialization
> inside the switch statement.  Something like:
>
> switch (inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
> case S_IFIFO:
> case S_IFBLK:
> case S_IFCHR:
> case S_IFSOCK:
> 	inode->i_blkbits = PAGE_SHIFT;
>         ...
> case S_IFREG:
> 	inode->i_blkbits = fls(le32_to_cpu(info->layout.fl_stripe_unit)) - 1;
> 	...
> case S_IFLNK:
> 	inode->i_blkbits = fls(le32_to_cpu(info->layout.fl_stripe_unit)) - 1;
> 	...
> case S_IFDIR:
> 	inode->i_blkbits = CEPH_BLOCK_SHIFT;
> 	...
> default:
> 	pr_err();
>         ...
> }
>
> This would add some code duplication (S_IFREG and S_IFLNK cases), but
> maybe it's a bit more clear.  The other option would be obviously to
> leave the initialization outside the switch and only change the
> i_blkbits value in the S_IF{IFO,BLK,CHR,SOCK,DIR} cases.
>
> Cheers,