[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hrP7q=NTKW2yukCThW4v4FJH4wqXS2ZQ8u8jJDDKMVeLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:17:52 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: nishkadg.linux@...il.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: sja1105: sja1105_main: Add of_node_put()
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 23:38, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:14:48 +0530
>
> > Each iteration of for_each_child_of_node puts the previous node, but in
> > the case of a return from the middle of the loop, there is no put, thus
> > causing a memory leak. Hence add an of_node_put before the return.
> > Issue found with Coccinelle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
>
> Applied.
>
> Again, the semantics of these looping constructs are terrible.
Strange.
Thanks for the fix.
-Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists