linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: IDU-intc: Add support for edge-triggered interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CY4PR1201MB012055687BED617CB2689678A1C60@CY4PR1201MB0120.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:53:30 +0000
From:   Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To:     Mischa Jonker <Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com>
CC:     Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
        "kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: IDU-intc: Add support for edge-triggered
 interrupts

Hi Mischa,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mischa Jonker <mischa.jonker@...opsys.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 1:26 PM
> To: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>; Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>;
> kstewart@...uxfoundation.org; tglx@...utronix.de; robh+dt@...nel.org; linux-snps-
> arc@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Mischa Jonker <mischa.jonker@...opsys.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: IDU-intc: Add support for edge-triggered interrupts
> 
> This updates the documentation for supporting  a optional extra interrupt
> cell to specify edge vs level triggered.

LGTM as well. But maybe split pure clean-up changes from addition of
the new property description so that info about addition of new property is
clearly seen? Otherwise it gets a bit lost among nice and useful generic fixes.

-Alexey