[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190724112318.GC2624@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:23:19 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lib/test_kasan: Add stack overflow test
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 06:49:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 18:24, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 03:28:18PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > Adds a simple stack overflow test, to check the error being reported on
> > > an overflow. Without CONFIG_STACK_GUARD_PAGE, the result is typically
> > > some seemingly unrelated KASAN error message due to accessing random
> > > other memory.
> >
> > Can't we use the LKDTM_EXHAUST_STACK case to check this?
> >
> > I was also under the impression that the other KASAN self-tests weren't
> > fatal, and IIUC this will kill the kernel.
> >
> > Given that, and given this is testing non-KASAN functionality, I'm not
> > sure it makes sense to bundle this with the KASAN tests.
>
> Thanks for pointing out LKDTM_EXHAUST_STACK.
>
> This patch can be dropped!
Cool; it's always nice to find the work has already been done! :)
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists