linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Boost queue head vCPU to mitigate lock waiter preemption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:17:14 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Boost queue head vCPU to mitigate lock waiter
 preemption

On 24/07/19 11:43, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> 
> Commit 11752adb (locking/pvqspinlock: Implement hybrid PV queued/unfair locks)
> introduces hybrid PV queued/unfair locks 
>  - queued mode (no starvation)
>  - unfair mode (good performance on not heavily contended lock)
> The lock waiter goes into the unfair mode especially in VMs with over-commit
> vCPUs since increaing over-commitment increase the likehood that the queue 
> head vCPU may have been preempted and not actively spinning.
> 
> However, reschedule queue head vCPU timely to acquire the lock still can get 
> better performance than just depending on lock stealing in over-subscribe 
> scenario.
> 
> Testing on 80 HT 2 socket Xeon Skylake server, with 80 vCPUs VM 80GB RAM:
> ebizzy -M
>              vanilla     boosting    improved
>  1VM          23520        25040         6%
>  2VM           8000        13600        70%
>  3VM           3100         5400        74%
> 
> The lock holder vCPU yields to the queue head vCPU when unlock, to boost queue 
> head vCPU which is involuntary preemption or the one which is voluntary halt 
> due to fail to acquire the lock after a short spin in the guest.

Clever!  I have applied the patch.

Paolo

> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 01e18ca..c6d951c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7206,7 +7206,7 @@ static void kvm_sched_yield(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long dest_id)
>  
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
> -	if (target)
> +	if (target && READ_ONCE(target->ready))
>  		kvm_vcpu_yield_to(target);
>  }
>  
> @@ -7246,6 +7246,7 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		break;
>  	case KVM_HC_KICK_CPU:
>  		kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(vcpu->kvm, a0, a1);
> +		kvm_sched_yield(vcpu->kvm, a1);
>  		ret = 0;
>  		break;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>