[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190724140212.qzvbcx5j2gi5lcoj@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:02:12 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
enh <enh@...gle.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/15] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
Hi Andrey,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:03:29PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:59 PM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > === Overview
> >
> > arm64 has a feature called Top Byte Ignore, which allows to embed pointer
> > tags into the top byte of each pointer. Userspace programs (such as
> > HWASan, a memory debugging tool [1]) might use this feature and pass
> > tagged user pointers to the kernel through syscalls or other interfaces.
> >
> > Right now the kernel is already able to handle user faults with tagged
> > pointers, due to these patches:
> >
> > 1. 81cddd65 ("arm64: traps: fix userspace cache maintenance emulation on a
> > tagged pointer")
> > 2. 7dcd9dd8 ("arm64: hw_breakpoint: fix watchpoint matching for tagged
> > pointers")
> > 3. 276e9327 ("arm64: entry: improve data abort handling of tagged
> > pointers")
> >
> > This patchset extends tagged pointer support to syscall arguments.
[...]
> Do you think this is ready to be merged?
>
> Should this go through the mm or the arm tree?
I would certainly prefer to take at least the arm64 bits via the arm64 tree
(i.e. patches 1, 2 and 15). We also need a Documentation patch describing
the new ABI.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists