[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190724151942.GA7205@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:19:42 -0400
From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: kprobes, livepatch and FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY
Hi Masami,
I wanted to revisit FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY blocking of kprobes and
livepatch, at least in cases where kprobe pre_handlers don't modify
regs->ip.
(We've discussed this previously at part of a kpatch github issue #47:
https://github.com/dynup/kpatch/issues/47)
The particular use case I was wondering about was perf probing a
particular function, then attempting to livepatch that same function:
% uname -r
5.3.0-rc1+
% dmesg -C
% perf probe --add cmdline_proc_show
Added new event:
probe:cmdline_proc_show (on cmdline_proc_show)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 1
% perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 30 &
[1] 1007
% insmod samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko
insmod: ERROR: could not insert module samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko: Device or resource busy
% dmesg
[ 440.913962] livepatch_sample: tainting kernel with TAINT_LIVEPATCH
[ 440.917123] livepatch_sample: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
[ 440.942493] livepatch: enabling patch 'livepatch_sample'
[ 440.943445] livepatch: failed to register ftrace handler for function 'cmdline_proc_show' (-16)
[ 440.944576] livepatch: failed to patch object 'vmlinux'
[ 440.945270] livepatch: failed to enable patch 'livepatch_sample'
[ 440.946085] livepatch: 'livepatch_sample': unpatching complete
This same behavior holds in reverse, if we want to probe a livepatched
function:
% insmod samples/livepatch/livepatch-sample.ko
% perf probe --add cmdline_proc_show
Added new event:
probe:cmdline_proc_show (on cmdline_proc_show)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 1
% perf record -e probe:cmdline_proc_show -aR sleep 30
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 16 (Device or resource busy) for event (probe:cmdline_proc_show).
/bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.
Now, if I read kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c :: kprobe_dispatcher()
correctly, it's only going to return !0 (indicating a modified regs->ip)
when kprobe_perf_func() returns !0, i.e. regs->ip changes over a call to
trace_call_bpf().
Aside: should kprobe_ftrace_handler() check that FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY
is set when a pre_handler returns !0?
In kpatch #47, Josh suggested:
- If a kprobe handler needs to modify IP, user sets KPROBE_FLAG_IPMODIFY
flag to register_kprobe, and then kprobes sets FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY
when registering with ftrace for that probe.
- If KPROBE_FLAG_IPMODIFY is not used, kprobe_ftrace_handler() can
detect when a kprobe handler changes regs->ip and restore it to its
original value (regs->ip = ip).
Is this something that could still be supported? In cases like perf
probe, could we get away with not setting FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY? The
current way that we're applying that flag, kprobes and livepatch are
mutually exclusive (for the same function).
Regards,
-- Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists