linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: ir-kbd-i2c: prevent potential NULL pointer access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 06:12:02 +0100
From:   Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc:     linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: ir-kbd-i2c: prevent potential NULL pointer
 access

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 07:26:31PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> i2c_new_dummy() can fail returning a NULL pointer. The code does not
> bail out in this case and the returned pointer is blindly used.

I don't see how. The existing code tries to set up the tx part; if
i2c_new_dummy() return NULL then the rcdev is registered without tx,
and tx_c is never used.

> Convert
> to devm_i2c_new_dummy_device() which returns an ERR_PTR and also bail
> out when failing the validity check.

Possibly I was being overly cautious with not bailing out if tx can't
be registered; moving to devm is probably a good idea. However the
commit message is misleading, because the existing code has no
NULL pointer access.

Sean

> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c
> index 876d7587a1da..f46717052efc 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ir-kbd-i2c.c
> @@ -885,9 +885,12 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ir->work, ir_work);
>  
>  	if (probe_tx) {
> -		ir->tx_c = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter, 0x70);
> -		if (!ir->tx_c) {
> +		ir->tx_c = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(&client->dev,
> +						     client->adapter, 0x70);
> +		if (IS_ERR(ir->tx_c)) {
>  			dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to setup tx i2c address");
> +			err = PTR_ERR(ir->tx_c);
> +			goto err_out_free;
>  		} else if (!zilog_init(ir)) {
>  			ir->carrier = 38000;
>  			ir->duty_cycle = 40;
> @@ -904,9 +907,6 @@ static int ir_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  	return 0;
>  
>   err_out_free:
> -	if (ir->tx_c)
> -		i2c_unregister_device(ir->tx_c);
> -
>  	/* Only frees rc if it were allocated internally */
>  	rc_free_device(rc);
>  	return err;
> @@ -919,9 +919,6 @@ static int ir_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  	/* kill outstanding polls */
>  	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ir->work);
>  
> -	if (ir->tx_c)
> -		i2c_unregister_device(ir->tx_c);
> -
>  	/* unregister device */
>  	rc_unregister_device(ir->rc);
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1