lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af960e70-7373-51f2-3ff3-f23335f94aa1@grimberg.me>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:43:27 -0700
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/16] chardev: introduce cdev_get_by_path()


>> So, as was kind of alluded to in another part of the thread, what are
>> you doing about permissions?  It seems that any user/group permissions
>> are out the window when you have the kernel itself do the opening of the
>> char device, right?  Why is that ok?  You can pass it _any_ character
>> device node and away it goes?  What if you give it a "wrong" one?  Char
>> devices are very different from block devices this way.
> 
> We could condition any configfs operation on capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN) to
> close that hole for now..

s/NET/SYS/...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ