[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190725052529.GA24355@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 07:25:29 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, eric.auger.pro@...il.com,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size
call
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:10:53PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Christoph - would a documented API wrapping dma_mask make sense?
> With the documentation explaining how users must
> desist from using DMA APIs if that returns false ...
We have some bigger changes in this are planned, including turning
dma_mask into a scalar instead of a pointer, please stay tuned.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists