linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 04/16] nvme-core: introduce nvme_get_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3bb266ae-abf3-0146-5d93-e7a600453493@deltatee.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:37:05 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/16] nvme-core: introduce nvme_get_by_path()



On 2019-07-25 2:31 p.m., Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:28:28PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019-07-25 1:58 p.m., Keith Busch wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:54:18AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2019-07-25 11:50 a.m., Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:23:23AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>> nvme_get_by_path() is analagous to blkdev_get_by_path() except it
>>>>>> gets a struct nvme_ctrl from the path to its char dev (/dev/nvme0).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The purpose of this function is to support NVMe-OF target passthru.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't find anywhere that you use this in this patchset.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh sorry, the commit message is out of date the function was actually
>>>> called nvme_ctrl_get_by_path() and it's used in Patch 10.
>>>
>>> Instead of by path, could we have configfs take something else, like
>>> the unique controller instance or serial number? I know that's different
>>> than how we handle blocks and files, but that way nvme core can lookup
>>> the cooresponding controller without adding new cdev dependencies.
>>
>> Well the previous version of the patchset just used the ctrl name
>> ("nvme1") and looped through all the controllers to find a match. But
>> this sucks because of the inconsistency and the fact that the name can
>> change if hardware changes and the number changes. Allowing the user to
>> make use of standard udev rules seems important to me.
> 
> Should we then create a new udev rule for persistent controller
> names? /dev/nvme1 may not be the same controller each time you refer
> to it.

Udev can only create symlinks from /dev/nvme0 to
/dev/nvme-persistent-name and users can do this as they need now. No
changes needed.

My point was if we use the ctrl name (nvme0) as a reference then the
kernel can't make use of these symlinks or anything udev does seeing
that name is internal to the kernel only.

If we use cdev_get_by_path()/nvme_ctrl_get_by_path() then this isn't a
problem as we can open a symlink to /dev/nvme0 without any issues.

Logan