[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190725215812.GN1330@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 22:58:12 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@...dia.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Price <Steven.Price@....com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Mark Brown <Mark.Brown@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page
table helpers
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:42:22PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:38:58PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 07:39:21AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > But 'page' isn't necessarily PMD-aligned. I don't think we can rely on
> > > architectures doing the right thing if asked to make a PMD for a randomly
> > > aligned page.
> > >
> > > How about finding the physical address of something like kernel_init(),
> > > and using the corresponding pte/pmd/pud/p4d/pgd that encompasses that
> > > address? It's also better to pass in the pfn/page rather than using global
> > > variables to communicate to the test functions.
> >
> > There are architectures (32-bit ARM) where the kernel is mapped using
> > section mappings, and we don't expect the Linux page table walking to
> > work for section mappings.
>
> This test doesn't go so far as to insert the PTE/PMD/PUD/... into the
> page tables. It merely needs an appropriately aligned PFN to create a
> PTE/PMD/PUD/... from.
Well, in any case,
c085ac68 t kernel_init
so I'm not sure that would be an improvement.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists