linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Support kexec/kdump for clang built kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907260105280.1791@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 01:09:03 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Support kexec/kdump for clang built kernel

On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:51 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> >
> > I'm really impressed how you manage to make the cover letter (0/N) a reply
> > to 1/N instead of 1..N/N being a reply to 0/N.
> >
> >   In-Reply-To: <20190725200625.174838-1-ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> >   Message-Id: <20190725200625.174838-3-ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> >
> > Is that a new git feature to be $corp top-posting compliant?
> 
> It appears to be a hidden bonus feature of:
> $ git-send-email purgatory/v4-000*

Care to poke the git folks?

> > > V4 of: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/23/864
> >
> > Please don't use lkml.org references. I know it's popular but equally
> > unreliable at times.
> 
> Oh?

404 or silent fail are happening on a regular base and of course always
when you really need that information. Murphy's law ...

Thanks,

	tglx