[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190725022623.jzrlsxkppa35kljz@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 07:56:23 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Anson.Huang@....com
Cc: vireshk@...nel.org, nm@...com, sboyd@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
leonard.crestez@....com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, ping.bai@....com,
daniel.baluta@....com, l.stach@...gutronix.de, abel.vesa@....com,
angus@...ea.ca, andrew.smirnov@...il.com, ccaione@...libre.com,
agx@...xcpu.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] opp: of: Support multiple suspend OPPs defined in
DT
On 09-07-19, 16:00, Anson.Huang@....com wrote:
> From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
>
> With property "opp-supported-hw" introduced, the OPP table
> in DT could be a large OPP table and ONLY a subset of OPPs
> are available, based on the version of the hardware running
> on. That introduces restriction of using "opp-suspend"
> property to define the suspend OPP, as we are NOT sure if the
> OPP containing "opp-suspend" property is available for the
> hardware running on, and the of opp core does NOT allow multiple
> suspend OPPs defined in DT OPP table.
>
> To eliminate this restrition, make of opp core allow multiple
> suspend OPPs defined in DT, and pick the OPP with highest rate
> and with "opp-suspend" property present to be suspend OPP, it
> can speed up the suspend/resume process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> ---
> No changes.
> ---
> drivers/opp/of.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists