[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <156404258547.2020.3652813018925680357.stgit@devnote2>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 17:16:25 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>,
Matt Hart <matthew.hart@...aro.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Daniel Diaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: Remove unneeded rcu_read_lock from debug handlers
Remove rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() from debug exception
handlers since we are sure those are not preemptible and
interrupts are off.
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
index f8719bd30850..48222a4760c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
@@ -207,16 +207,16 @@ static int call_step_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
list = user_mode(regs) ? &user_step_hook : &kernel_step_hook;
- rcu_read_lock();
-
+ /*
+ * Since single-step exception disables interrupt, this function is
+ * entirely not preemptible, and we can use rcu list safely here.
+ */
list_for_each_entry_rcu(hook, list, node) {
retval = hook->fn(regs, esr);
if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
break;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
-
return retval;
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(call_step_hook);
@@ -305,14 +305,16 @@ static int call_break_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
list = user_mode(regs) ? &user_break_hook : &kernel_break_hook;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ /*
+ * Since brk exception disables interrupt, this function is
+ * entirely not preemptible, and we can use rcu list safely here.
+ */
list_for_each_entry_rcu(hook, list, node) {
unsigned int comment = esr & ESR_ELx_BRK64_ISS_COMMENT_MASK;
if ((comment & ~hook->mask) == hook->imm)
fn = hook->fn;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
return fn ? fn(regs, esr) : DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists