[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190724174423.1826c92f72ce9c815ebc72d9@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:44:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, mhocko@...nel.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 2/2] mm: mempolicy: handle vma with unmovable pages
mapped correctly in mbind
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:19:34 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
> On 7/23/19 7:35 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/22/19 6:02 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:25:09 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> since there may be pages off LRU temporarily. We should migrate other
> >>>> pages if MPOL_MF_MOVE* is specified. Set has_unmovable flag if some
> >>>> paged could not be not moved, then return -EIO for mbind() eventually.
> >>>>
> >>>> With this change the above test would return -EIO as expected.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> >>>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> >>>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> I'm a bit surprised that this doesn't have a cc:stable. Did we
> >> consider that?
> >
> > The VM_BUG just happens on 4.9, and it is enabled only by CONFIG_VM. For
> > post-4.9 kernel, this fixes the semantics of mbind which should be not a
> > regression IMHO.
>
> 4.9 is a LTS kernel, so perhaps worth trying?
>
OK, I'll add cc:stable to
mm-mempolicy-make-the-behavior-consistent-when-mpol_mf_move-and-mpol_mf_strict-were-specified.patch
and
mm-mempolicy-handle-vma-with-unmovable-pages-mapped-correctly-in-mbind.patch
Do we have a Fixes: for these patches?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists