[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190725095502.GM12715@pdeschrijver-desktop.Nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:55:02 +0300
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
CC: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
<marc.zyngier@....com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<stefan@...er.ch>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <jckuo@...dia.com>,
<josephl@...dia.com>, <talho@...dia.com>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<mperttunen@...dia.com>, <spatra@...dia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 01/21] irqchip: tegra: Do not disable COP IRQ during
suspend
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:54:51PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
> All Tegra SoCs support SC7, hence the 'supports_sc7' and the comment
> doesn't sound correct to me. Something like 'firmware_sc7' should suit
> better here.
>
> > + writel_relaxed(~0ul, ictlr + ICTLR_COP_IER_CLR);
>
> Secondly, I'm also not sure why COP interrupts need to be disabled for
> pre-T210 at all, since COP is unused. This looks to me like it was
> cut-n-pasted from downstream kernel without a good reason and could be
> simply removed.
I don't think we can rely on the fact that COP is unused. People can
write their own code to run on COP.
Peter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists