linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc/tegra: pmc: Query PCLK clock rate at probe time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:15:52 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc/tegra: pmc: Query PCLK clock rate at probe
 time

25.07.2019 12:36, Peter De Schrijver пишет:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 05:35:10AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> The PCLK clock is running off SCLK, which is a critical clock that is
>> very unlikely to randomly change its rate. It's also a bit clumsy (and
>> apparently incorrect) to query the clock's rate with interrupts being
>> disabled because clk_get_rate() takes a mutex and that's the case during
>> suspend/cpuidle entering.
>>
> 
> SCLK and PCLK certainly can change rate at runtime, although the code to
> handle this hasn't reached upstream yet.

Okay, maybe this patch is indeed not very worthwhile then. I'm leaving
it up to you, guys, to decide.