| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAGTfZH0JE0PmiCHaT3vMrDaP0-8eZ3afyHy_zT9aFmMOGNTR8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 21:43:31 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...tner.samsung.com>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>, inki.dae@...sung.com,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
georgi.djakov@...aro.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] devfreq: exynos-bus: Extract exynos_bus_profile_init()
2019년 7월 24일 (수) 오전 8:09, Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...tner.samsung.com>님이 작성:
>
> This patch adds a new static function, exynos_bus_profile_init(), extracted
> from exynos_bus_probe().
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@...tner.samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> index d9f377912c10..d8f1efaf2d49 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> @@ -372,12 +372,69 @@ static int exynos_bus_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int exynos_bus_profile_init(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> + struct devfreq_dev_profile *profile)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> + struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *ondemand_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Initialize the struct profile and governor data for parent device */
> + profile->polling_ms = 50;
> + profile->target = exynos_bus_target;
> + profile->get_dev_status = exynos_bus_get_dev_status;
> + profile->exit = exynos_bus_exit;
> +
> + ondemand_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ondemand_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ondemand_data) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + ondemand_data->upthreshold = 40;
> + ondemand_data->downdifferential = 5;
> +
> + /* Add devfreq device to monitor and handle the exynos bus */
> + bus->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev, profile,
> + DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND,
> + ondemand_data);
> + if (IS_ERR(bus->devfreq)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to add devfreq device\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + /* Register opp_notifier to catch the change of OPP */
> + ret = devm_devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, bus->devfreq);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register opp notifier\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Enable devfreq-event to get raw data which is used to determine
> + * current bus load.
> + */
> + ret = exynos_bus_enable_edev(bus);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable devfreq-event devices\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + ret = exynos_bus_set_event(bus);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set event to devfreq-event devices\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> +err:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node, *node;
> struct devfreq_dev_profile *profile;
> - struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *ondemand_data;
> struct devfreq_passive_data *passive_data;
> struct devfreq *parent_devfreq;
> struct exynos_bus *bus;
> @@ -418,52 +475,9 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err;
>
> - /* Initialize the struct profile and governor data for parent device */
> - profile->polling_ms = 50;
> - profile->target = exynos_bus_target;
> - profile->get_dev_status = exynos_bus_get_dev_status;
> - profile->exit = exynos_bus_exit;
> -
> - ondemand_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ondemand_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!ondemand_data) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> + ret = exynos_bus_profile_init(bus, profile);
> + if (ret < 0)
> goto err;
> - }
> - ondemand_data->upthreshold = 40;
> - ondemand_data->downdifferential = 5;
> -
> - /* Add devfreq device to monitor and handle the exynos bus */
> - bus->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev, profile,
> - DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND,
> - ondemand_data);
> - if (IS_ERR(bus->devfreq)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to add devfreq device\n");
> - ret = PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> - goto err;
> - }
> -
> - /* Register opp_notifier to catch the change of OPP */
> - ret = devm_devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, bus->devfreq);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to register opp notifier\n");
> - goto err;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Enable devfreq-event to get raw data which is used to determine
> - * current bus load.
> - */
> - ret = exynos_bus_enable_edev(bus);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to enable devfreq-event devices\n");
> - goto err;
> - }
> -
> - ret = exynos_bus_set_event(bus);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to set event to devfreq-event devices\n");
> - goto err;
> - }
>
> goto out;
> passive:
> --
> 2.17.1
>
NACK.
It has not any benefit and I don't understand reason why it is necessary.
I don't agree. Please drop it.
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists