linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] EDAC, altera: Move Stratix10 SDRAM ECC to peripheral

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:46:57 +0100
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     bp@...en8.de, mchehab@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] EDAC, altera: Move Stratix10 SDRAM ECC to peripheral

Hi Thor,

On 12/07/2019 19:28, thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> ARM32 SoCFPGAs had separate IRQs for SDRAM. ARM64 SoCFPGAs
> send all DBEs to SError so filtering by source is necessary.
> 
> The Stratix10 SDRAM ECC is a better match with the generic
> Altera peripheral ECC framework because the linked list can
> be searched to find the ECC block offset and printout
> the DBE Address.


> diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> index c2e693e34d43..09a80b53acea 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c

> @@ -2231,13 +2275,15 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		    of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-dma-ecc") ||
>  		    of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-usb-ecc") ||
>  		    of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-qspi-ecc") ||
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_ALTERA_SDRAM
> +		    of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,sdram-edac-s10") ||
> +#endif
>  		    of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,socfpga-sdmmc-ecc"))

I'm just curious: This list looks suspiciously like the altr_edac_a10_device_of_match[]
list. Is there a reason it can't use of_match_device() here?

>  
>  			altr_edac_a10_device_add(edac, child);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_EDAC_ALTERA_SDRAM
> -		else if ((of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,sdram-edac-a10")) ||
> -			 (of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,sdram-edac-s10")))
> +		else if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "altr,sdram-edac-a10"))
>  			of_platform_populate(pdev->dev.of_node,
>  					     altr_sdram_ctrl_of_match,
>  					     NULL, &pdev->dev);


Acked-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>


Thanks,

James