linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/3] Fix backward-ring-buffer.c format-truncation error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8ec2cbb1bb2a4aceab09ca685255119a@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:08:45 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo' <nums@...gle.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" 
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "songliubraving@...com" <songliubraving@...com>,
        "mbd@...com" <mbd@...com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "irogers@...gle.com" <irogers@...gle.com>,
        "eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] Fix backward-ring-buffer.c format-truncation error

From: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo
> Sent: 24 July 2019 19:45
>
> Perf does not build with the ubsan (undefined behavior sanitizer)
> and there is an error that says:
> 
> tests/backward-ring-buffer.c:23:45: error: ‘%d’ directive output
> may be truncated writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of
> size 8 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
>    snprintf(proc_name, sizeof(proc_name), "p:%d\n", i);
> 
> This can be reproduced by running (from the tip directory):
> make -C tools/perf USE_CLANG=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=undefined"
> 
> Th error occurs because they are writing to the 10 byte buffer - the
> index 'i' of the for loop and the 2 byte hardcoded string. If somehow 'i'
> was greater than 8 bytes (10 - 2), then the snprintf function would
> truncate the string. Increasing the size of the buffer fixes the error.

Get the compiler fixed so that it knows the domain of the value can never
exceed the compile-time constant NR_ITERS.

> Signed-off-by: Numfor Mbiziwo-Tiapo <nums@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/backward-ring-buffer.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/backward-ring-buffer.c b/tools/perf/tests/backward-ring-buffer.c
> index 6d598cc071ae..1a9c3becf5ff 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/backward-ring-buffer.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/backward-ring-buffer.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static void testcase(void)
>  	int i;
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERS; i++) {
> -		char proc_name[10];
> +		char proc_name[15];

At least use [16]

> 
>  		snprintf(proc_name, sizeof(proc_name), "p:%d\n", i);
>  		prctl(PR_SET_NAME, proc_name);
> --
> 2.22.0.657.g960e92d24f-goog

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)