[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190726152305.671081836@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:24:33 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+d6636a36d3c34bd88938@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 34/66] netrom: fix a memory leak in nr_rx_frame()
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit c8c8218ec5af5d2598381883acbefbf604e56b5e ]
When the skb is associated with a new sock, just assigning
it to skb->sk is not sufficient, we have to set its destructor
to free the sock properly too.
Reported-by: syzbot+d6636a36d3c34bd88938@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netrom/af_netrom.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
+++ b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ int nr_rx_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, str
unsigned short frametype, flags, window, timeout;
int ret;
- skb->sk = NULL; /* Initially we don't know who it's for */
+ skb_orphan(skb);
/*
* skb->data points to the netrom frame start
@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ int nr_rx_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, str
window = skb->data[20];
skb->sk = make;
+ skb->destructor = sock_efree;
make->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED;
/* Fill in his circuit details */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists