linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.2 62/66] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190726152308.450282363@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:25:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 62/66] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>

commit 88dddc11a8d6b09201b4db9d255b3394d9bc9e57 upstream.

If a KVM guest is reset while running a nested guest, free_nested will
disable the shadow VMCS execution control in the vmcs01.  However,
on the next KVM_RUN vmx_vcpu_run would nevertheless try to sync
the VMCS12 to the shadow VMCS which has since been freed.

This causes a vmptrld of a NULL pointer on my machime, but Jan reports
the host to hang altogether.  Let's see how much this trivial patch fixes.

Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ static void vmx_disable_shadow_vmcs(stru
 {
 	vmcs_clear_bits(SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS);
 	vmcs_write64(VMCS_LINK_POINTER, -1ull);
+	vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_sync = false;
 }
 
 static inline void nested_release_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -1321,6 +1322,9 @@ static void copy_shadow_to_vmcs12(struct
 	u64 field_value;
 	struct vmcs *shadow_vmcs = vmx->vmcs01.shadow_vmcs;
 
+	if (WARN_ON(!shadow_vmcs))
+		return;
+
 	preempt_disable();
 
 	vmcs_load(shadow_vmcs);
@@ -1359,6 +1363,9 @@ static void copy_vmcs12_to_shadow(struct
 	u64 field_value = 0;
 	struct vmcs *shadow_vmcs = vmx->vmcs01.shadow_vmcs;
 
+	if (WARN_ON(!shadow_vmcs))
+		return;
+
 	vmcs_load(shadow_vmcs);
 
 	for (q = 0; q < ARRAY_SIZE(fields); q++) {
@@ -4300,7 +4307,6 @@ static inline void nested_release_vmcs12
 		/* copy to memory all shadowed fields in case
 		   they were modified */
 		copy_shadow_to_vmcs12(vmx);
-		vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_sync = false;
 		vmx_disable_shadow_vmcs(vmx);
 	}
 	vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv = -1;