linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 17/50] rxrpc: Fix send on a connected, but unbound socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190726152302.332604716@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:24:52 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+7966f2a0b2c7da8939b4@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 17/50] rxrpc: Fix send on a connected, but unbound socket

From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit e835ada07091f40dcfb1bc735082bd0a7c005e59 ]

If sendmsg() or sendmmsg() is called on a connected socket that hasn't had
bind() called on it, then an oops will occur when the kernel tries to
connect the call because no local endpoint has been allocated.

Fix this by implicitly binding the socket if it is in the
RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND state, just like it does for the RXRPC_UNBOUND state.

Further, the state should be transitioned to RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND after this
to prevent further attempts to bind it.

This can be tested with:

	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <stdlib.h>
	#include <string.h>
	#include <sys/socket.h>
	#include <arpa/inet.h>
	#include <linux/rxrpc.h>
	static const unsigned char inet6_addr[16] = {
		0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -1, -1, 0xac, 0x14, 0x14, 0xaa
	};
	int main(void)
	{
		struct sockaddr_rxrpc srx;
		struct cmsghdr *cm;
		struct msghdr msg;
		unsigned char control[16];
		int fd;
		memset(&srx, 0, sizeof(srx));
		srx.srx_family = 0x21;
		srx.srx_service = 0;
		srx.transport_type = AF_INET;
		srx.transport_len = 0x1c;
		srx.transport.sin6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
		srx.transport.sin6.sin6_port = htons(0x4e22);
		srx.transport.sin6.sin6_flowinfo = htons(0x4e22);
		srx.transport.sin6.sin6_scope_id = htons(0xaa3b);
		memcpy(&srx.transport.sin6.sin6_addr, inet6_addr, 16);
		cm = (struct cmsghdr *)control;
		cm->cmsg_len	= CMSG_LEN(sizeof(unsigned long));
		cm->cmsg_level	= SOL_RXRPC;
		cm->cmsg_type	= RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID;
		*(unsigned long *)CMSG_DATA(cm) = 0;
		msg.msg_name = NULL;
		msg.msg_namelen = 0;
		msg.msg_iov = NULL;
		msg.msg_iovlen = 0;
		msg.msg_control = control;
		msg.msg_controllen = cm->cmsg_len;
		msg.msg_flags = 0;
		fd = socket(AF_RXRPC, SOCK_DGRAM, AF_INET);
		connect(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&srx, sizeof(srx));
		sendmsg(fd, &msg, 0);
		return 0;
	}

Leading to the following oops:

	BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
	#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
	#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
	...
	RIP: 0010:rxrpc_connect_call+0x42/0xa01
	...
	Call Trace:
	 ? mark_held_locks+0x47/0x59
	 ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xb6/0xba
	 rxrpc_new_client_call+0x3b1/0x762
	 ? rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0x3c0/0x92e
	 rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0x3c0/0x92e
	 rxrpc_sendmsg+0x16b/0x1b5
	 sock_sendmsg+0x2d/0x39
	 ___sys_sendmsg+0x1a4/0x22a
	 ? release_sock+0x19/0x9e
	 ? reacquire_held_locks+0x136/0x160
	 ? release_sock+0x19/0x9e
	 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x6e
	 ? __lock_acquire+0x268/0xf73
	 ? rxrpc_connect+0xdd/0xe4
	 ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xb6/0xba
	 __sys_sendmsg+0x5e/0x94
	 do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x1bf
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Fixes: 2341e0775747 ("rxrpc: Simplify connect() implementation and simplify sendmsg() op")
Reported-by: syzbot+7966f2a0b2c7da8939b4@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c
@@ -552,6 +552,7 @@ static int rxrpc_sendmsg(struct socket *
 
 	switch (rx->sk.sk_state) {
 	case RXRPC_UNBOUND:
+	case RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND:
 		rx->srx.srx_family = AF_RXRPC;
 		rx->srx.srx_service = 0;
 		rx->srx.transport_type = SOCK_DGRAM;
@@ -576,10 +577,9 @@ static int rxrpc_sendmsg(struct socket *
 		}
 
 		rx->local = local;
-		rx->sk.sk_state = RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND;
+		rx->sk.sk_state = RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND;
 		/* Fall through */
 
-	case RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND:
 	case RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND:
 		if (!m->msg_name &&
 		    test_bit(RXRPC_SOCK_CONNECTED, &rx->flags)) {