lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 18:00:06 +0200
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>, <jic23@...nel.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     <mark.rutland@....com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        <lars@...afoo.de>, <knaack.h@....de>, <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add missing vdda-supply to STM32 ADC

Hi Fabrice

On 6/19/19 2:29 PM, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> Add missing vdda-supply, analog power supply, to STM32 ADC. When vdda is
> an independent supply, it needs to be properly turned on or off to supply
> the ADC.
> This series proposes fixes for the dt-bindings, IIO driver and relevant
> device tree files.
> 
> Fabrice Gasnier (5):
>    dt-bindings: iio: adc: stm32: add missing vdda supply
>    iio: adc: stm32-adc: add missing vdda-supply
>    ARM: dts: stm32: remove fixed regulator unit address on stm32429i-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add missing vdda-supply to adc on stm32429i-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add missing vdda-supply to adc on stm32h743i-eval
> 
>   .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/st,stm32-adc.txt   |  1 +
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts               | 25 +++++++++++-----------
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743i-eval.dts              |  1 +
>   drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc-core.c                   | 21 +++++++++++++++++-
>   4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 

DT patches applied on stm32-next. I plan to add them in my PR for v5.4.
However those patches are marked as "fixes", do you see an issue to only 
send it for v5.4 ?

Regards
alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ