[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190726165226.7068704eb54a0104aaead703@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:52:26 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"matthew.wilcox@...cle.com" <matthew.wilcox@...cle.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
"william.kucharski@...cle.com" <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
"srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] uprobe: use FOLL_SPLIT_PMD instead of FOLL_SPLIT
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 23:44:34 +0000 Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 26, 2019, at 4:02 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 22:46:54 -0700 Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> wrote:
> >
> >> This patches uses newly added FOLL_SPLIT_PMD in uprobe. This enables easy
> >> regroup of huge pmd after the uprobe is disabled (in next patch).
> >
> > Confused. There is no "next patch".
>
> That was the patch 5, which was in earlier versions. I am working on
> addressing Kirill's feedback for it.
>
> Do I need to resubmit 4/4 with modified change log?
Please just send new changelog text now. I assume this [4/4] patch is
useful without patch #5, but a description of why it is useful is
appropriate.
I trust the fifth patch is to be sent soon?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists