[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907260917340.1791@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:20:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Use IPI shorthands in kvm guest when support
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 14:10, Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com> wrote:
> > static void kvm_send_ipi_all(int vector)
> > {
> > - __send_ipi_mask(cpu_online_mask, vector);
> > + if (static_branch_likely(&apic_use_ipi_shorthand))
> > + orig_apic.send_IPI_allbutself(vector);
>
> Make a mistake here, just resend the patch.
Please don't use [RESEND] if the patch is different. Use [PATCH v2].
[RESEND] is used when you actually resend an unmodified patch, e.g. when
the first submission was ignored for a longer time.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists