[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d5bc940-eadd-4f82-0bac-6a731369436d@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 11:35:44 +0200
From: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jank@...ence.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/40] soundwire: intel: add debugfs register dump
On 2019-07-26 01:39, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> +static void intel_debugfs_init(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
> +{
> + struct dentry *root = sdw->cdns.bus.debugfs;
> +
> + if (!root)
> + return;
> +
> + sdw->fs = debugfs_create_dir("intel-sdw", root);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sdw->fs)) {
> + dev_err(sdw->cdns.dev, "debugfs root creation failed\n");
> + sdw->fs = NULL;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + debugfs_create_file("intel-registers", 0400, sdw->fs, sdw,
> + &intel_reg_fops);
> +
> + sdw_cdns_debugfs_init(&sdw->cdns, sdw->fs);
> +}
I believe there should be dummy equivalent of _init and _exit if debugfs
is not enabled (if these are defined already and I've missed it, please
ignore).
> +static void intel_debugfs_exit(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
> +{
> + debugfs_remove_recursive(sdw->fs);
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists