[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a61b9f1-86d5-438e-204b-0db3ef0796e3@kontron.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 10:07:02 +0000
From: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Admatec AG
On 26.07.19 12:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 11:48, Schrempf Frieder
> <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 26.07.19 08:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Add vendor prefix for Admatec AG.
>>
>> We get the displays used with the Kontron eval kits from "admatec GmbH"
>> in Hamburg, not "Admatec AG" in Switzerland. I think we have to
>> differentiate here.
>>
>> I will review patch 2/2 soon...
>
> What a coincidence... they have so similar portfolio. After looking at
> vendor prefixes that would be the first duplication of name.
I have no idea, whether they are related somehow or have a common history...
>
> To avoid conflict, how about: "admatecde"?
Would be ok, I guess.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists