linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: rename sum_nr_running to sum_h_nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 07:47:45 +0530
From:   Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, quentin.perret@....com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
        pauld@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: rename sum_nr_running to sum_h_nr_running

* Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> [2019-07-19 09:58:22]:

> sum_nr_running will track rq->nr_running task and sum_h_nr_running
> will track cfs->h_nr_running so we can use both to detect when other
> scheduling class are running and preempt CFS.
> 
> There is no functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> ---
>  
>  	ld_moved = 0;
> -	if (busiest->nr_running > 1) {
> +	if (busiest->cfs.h_nr_running > 1) {

We should be looking for nr_running here.
There could be only one cfs task but that may not be the current running
task, so it could be a good one to be picked for load balancing.

No?

>  		/*
>  		 * Attempt to move tasks. If find_busiest_group has found
>  		 * an imbalance but busiest->nr_running <= 1, the group is
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju