[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190726141705.9585-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 22:17:05 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: rds: Fix possible null-pointer dereferences in rds_rdma_cm_event_handler_cmn()
In rds_rdma_cm_event_handler_cmn(), there are some if statements to
check whether conn is NULL, such as on lines 65, 96 and 112.
But conn is not checked before being used on line 108:
trans->cm_connect_complete(conn, event);
and on lines 140-143:
rdsdebug("DISCONNECT event - dropping connection "
"%pI6c->%pI6c\n", &conn->c_laddr,
&conn->c_faddr);
rds_conn_drop(conn);
Thus, possible null-pointer dereferences may occur.
To fix these bugs, conn is checked before being used.
These bugs are found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by us.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
net/rds/rdma_transport.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/rds/rdma_transport.c b/net/rds/rdma_transport.c
index ff74c4bbb9fc..9986d6065c4d 100644
--- a/net/rds/rdma_transport.c
+++ b/net/rds/rdma_transport.c
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ static int rds_rdma_cm_event_handler_cmn(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
break;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_ESTABLISHED:
- trans->cm_connect_complete(conn, event);
+ if (conn)
+ trans->cm_connect_complete(conn, event);
break;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_REJECTED:
@@ -137,6 +138,8 @@ static int rds_rdma_cm_event_handler_cmn(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
break;
case RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED:
+ if (!conn)
+ break;
rdsdebug("DISCONNECT event - dropping connection "
"%pI6c->%pI6c\n", &conn->c_laddr,
&conn->c_faddr);
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists