[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190727015716.GA4902@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 04:57:16 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: display/bridge: Add binding for IMX NWL
mipi dsi host controller
Hi Guido,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:52:25PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> The Northwest Logic MIPI DSI IP core can be found in NXPs i.MX8 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/display/bridge/imx-nwl-dsi.txt | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/imx-nwl-dsi.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/imx-nwl-dsi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/imx-nwl-dsi.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..288fdb726d5a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/imx-nwl-dsi.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +Northwest Logic MIPI-DSI on imx SoCs
> +=====================================
There's one too many =.
> +
> +NWL MIPI-DSI host controller found on i.MX8 platforms. This is a
> +dsi bridge for the for the NWL MIPI-DSI host.
s/dsi/DSI/
s/for the for the /for the /
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: "fsl,<chip>-nwl-dsi"
> + The following strings are expected:
> + "fsl,imx8mq-nwl-dsi"
> +- reg: the register range of the MIPI-DSI controller
> +- interrupts: the interrupt number for this module
It's not just a number but a specifier (with flags).
> +- clock, clock-names: phandles to the MIPI-DSI clocks
That should be phandles and names.
> + The following clocks are expected on all platforms:
Expected or required ?
s/ on all platforms// as you only support a single platform.
> + "core" - DSI core clock
> + "tx_esc" - TX_ESC clock (used in escape mode)
> + "rx_esc" - RX_ESC clock (used in escape mode)
> + "phy_ref" - PHY_REF clock. Clock is managed by the phy. Only
> + used to read the clock rate.
> +- assigned-clocks: phandles to clocks that require initial configuration
> +- assigned-clock-rates: rates of the clocks that require initial configuration
> + The following clocks need to have an initial configuration:
> + "tx_esc" (20 MHz) and "rx_esc" (80 Mhz).
I think those two properties are out of scope for these bindings.
> +- phys: phandle to the phy module representing the DPHY
> + inside the MIPI-DSI IP block
> +- phy-names: should be "dphy"
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- power-domains phandle to the power domain
> +- src phandle to the system reset controller (required on
> + i.MX8MQ)
Should this use the standard resets property ?
> +- mux-sel phandle to the MUX register set (required on i.MX8MQ)
> +- assigned-clock-parents phandles to parent clocks that needs to be assigned as
> + parents to clocks defined in assigned-clocks
This property is also out of scope.
> +
> +Example:
> + mipi_dsi: mipi_dsi@...00000 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-nwl-dsi";
> + reg = <0x30A00000 0x300>;
> + clocks = <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_CORE>,
> + <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_AHB>,
> + <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_IPG_DIV>,
> + <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_PHY_REF>;
> + clock-names = "core", "rx_esc", "tx_esc", "phy_ref";
> + assigned-clocks = <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_AHB>,
> + <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_CORE>,
> + <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_IPG_DIV>;
> + assigned-clock-parents = <&clk IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_80M>,
> + <&clk IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_266M>;
> + assigned-clock-rates = <80000000>,
> + <266000000>,
> + <20000000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + power-domains = <&pgc_mipi>;
> + src = <&src>;
> + mux-sel = <&iomuxc_gpr>;
> + phys = <&dphy>;
> + phy-names = "dphy";
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + panel@0 {
> + compatible = "...";
> + port {
> + panel_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&mipi_dsi_out>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> + mipi_dsi_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&dcss_disp0_mipi_dsi>;
> + };
> + };
> + port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + mipi_dsi_out: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
The ports should be documented too. There are multiple example bindings
available.
> + };
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists