[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190727194217.izpetvy5fz4dqj7q@brauner.io>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 21:42:17 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pidfd: add P_PIDFD to waitid()
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 09:41:25AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 9:28 AM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Something like
> >
> > struct pid *fd_to_pid(unsigned int fd)
> > {
> > struct fd f;
> > struct pid *pid;
> ...
>
> I forgot to put my usual disclaimer about TOTALLY UNTESTED GARBAGE in
> that email. I want to make that part clear: that code snippet was
> meant as a rough guide of direction, not as a "this works".
>
> Hopefully that was clear.
Yeah. I don't take code someone else has written without verifying or
testing into my own code. And I hope people do the same with mine. :)
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists