[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXbwPNt-SiudX+xup1vmkjksJpy-GJAT2K-g_dFw6d6vA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 07:33:21 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] lib/vdso/32: Remove inconsistent NULL pointer checks
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 6:20 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> The 32bit variants of vdso_clock_gettime()/getres() have a NULL pointer
> check for the timespec pointer. That's inconsistent vs. 64bit.
>
> But the vdso implementation will never be consistent versus the syscall
> because the only case which it can handle is NULL. Any other invalid
> pointer will cause a segfault. So special casing NULL is not really useful.
>
> Remove it along with the superflouos syscall fallback invocation as that
> will return -EFAULT anyway. That also gets rid of the dubious typecast
> which only works because the pointer is NULL.
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
FWIW, the equivalent change to gettimeofday would be an ABI break,
since we historically have that check, and it even makes sense there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists