[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1564345983.9737.9.camel@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:33:03 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: "james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"jlu@...gutronix.de" <jlu@...gutronix.de>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"patches@...linux.org.uk" <patches@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] EDAC drivers for Armada XP L2 and DDR
On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 15:53 +0100, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 12/07/2019 04:48, Chris Packham wrote:
> >
> > I still seem to be struggling to get this on anyone's radar.
> Whose radar does it need to cross?
>
That's a good question. The last solid guidance I had was that this
series was going in via the ARM tree. But as you say below that was two
years ago.
I only realised recently that the ARM core seems to have a different
workflow to other kernel subsystems.
>
> >
> > The Reviews/Acks have been given so this should be good to go in
> > via the ARM
> > tree as planned.
> >
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-August/5
> > 25561.html
> For your v8 I took this to mean this series was done!
>
> If nothing has changed with Boris and Russell's decision (it was two
> years ago....),
> details of the patch system are here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190624142346.pxljv3m4npatd
> iyk@...ll.armlinux.org.uk/
>
Thanks for the link. I would have never found that. I did try to follow
what I could find on https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/ but a lot
of that seems to be out of date.
I did manage to submit v9 to the ARM patch tracker but naturally I
messed it up the first time https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patch
es/viewpatch.php?id=8877/1 and I'm not sure I got the second attempt
right either https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.ph
p?id=8885/1
> Thanks,
>
> James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists