[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190728235320.8600-1-mcroce@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 01:53:20 +0200
From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm_pmu: mark expected switch fall-through
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through,
fixes the following warning:
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c: In function ‘cpu_pm_pmu_notify’:
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c:726:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
cpu_pm_pmu_setup(armpmu, cmd);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c:727:2: note: here
case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED:
^~~~
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 2d06b8095a19..3eb711066a22 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -724,6 +724,7 @@ static int cpu_pm_pmu_notify(struct notifier_block *b, unsigned long cmd,
break;
case CPU_PM_EXIT:
cpu_pm_pmu_setup(armpmu, cmd);
+ /* fallthrough */
case CPU_PM_ENTER_FAILED:
armpmu->start(armpmu);
break;
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists