[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907281111570.1791@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 11:13:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Handle PREEMPT_RT for version string and magic
Masahiro,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> Since CONFIG_PREEMPTION was introduced after -rc1,
> I think this should be queued on top of -rc2.
Right. Are you picking it up?
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> > -#define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT "preempt "
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
> > +# ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> > +# define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT "preempt "
> > +# else
> > +# define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT "preempt_rt "
> > +# endif
> > #else
> > -#define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT ""
> > +# define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT ""
>
> Maybe, is the following more readable?
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
> #define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT "preempt_rt "
> #elif defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT)
> #define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT "preempt "
> #else
> #define MODULE_VERMAGIC_PREEMPT ""
> #endif
Doh. That's obvious. Must be a result of the heat wave we had.
Will send a V2.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists